Write. Respond. Publish.

Three intelligent workspaces — write the manuscript, answer reviewers, run the analysis. All in one place.

Free credits on sign-upNo subscription requiredYour manuscript stays private
peereply.com/writing
Secure workspace
Introduction Library - 87 papers

Peereply builds a focused source library before drafting(source card). It ranks papers by topic match, design, recency, and citation signal(verified source).The next sentence moves from background to a clear evidence gap(matched paper)

AI suggestion - Tab to accept
Add one gap sentence tied to the strongest evidence card(source card).
Reviewer 2 - Major

Please clarify why this method was chosen and how it affects the findings.

Diplomatic draft

We thank the reviewer for this point. We added the method rationale and clarified its effect on interpretation in the Methods.

Mixed model R code ready
Agent route
1Profile columns
2Choose test
3Check assumptions
4Save table
Figure
Save verified outputs back to the paper or reviewer comment.
Ready to submit
APA 7
87
Source checks
0
Silent claims
WordLaTeXPDFBibTeX
Bibliography rendered in APA 7 with DOI links.
Response drafted
12 citations added
Three intelligent workspaces

Write the paper. Answer reviewers. Run analysis.

One shared context keeps your sources, tracked edits, tables, and figures in sync.

Manuscript writing workspace

Start with a research question. Get sources before sentences.

Enter a topic. Peereply builds a live source map, then suggests cited sentences one at a time.

1

Define topic and study type

2

Build source libraries

3

Draft with citations in view

What manuscript are you trying to write?
Add topic, population, outcome, and article type if known.
Open full workspace
Analysis workspace

Ask for the analysis. Get the right output.

Upload data, request a table, model, ROC curve, or figure, then save the verified result back to the manuscript.

Open analysis workspace
01
Describe the analysis

Ask in plain language.

02
Hermes routes it

Match columns to tests, graphs, and packages.

03
Verify outputs

Show calculations and code.

04
Return to manuscript

Save tables and figures back to the paper.

Example route

Create a mixed model and a paired plot

Data profileHermes skillR codeSave output
For revision deadlines this week

Sell the outcome: a calmer resubmission, not another AI tool.

Researchers do not wake up wanting credits. They wake up needing a clean response letter, a revised manuscript, and confidence that the editor will see every concern handled.

Free tools bring in high-intent researchers searching for help.
Credit packs monetize do-it-yourself revision workflows.
Urgent revision rescue gives desperate deadline users a premium path.
Free lead magnet

Analyze comments

Let visitors paste reviewer comments, see the severity, and understand what Peereply can solve.

$0

Use free analyzer
Core product

Response package

Generate point-by-point replies, citation suggestions, and a reviewable export workflow.

From $4.99

Buy credits
Premium

Revision rescue

For authors with a deadline, major revision, or high-stakes journal resubmission.

From $249

Reviewer workspace

Build the response package in one pass.

Upload comments and manuscript context. Review replies, redlines, and citation support before export.

01
Materials intake

Upload comments and manuscript context.

02
Comment parsing

Separate concerns and priorities.

03
Draft package

Draft replies and edits.

04
Export review

Approve and export.

Manuscript-awarePoint-by-point repliesClean + redline export
Review materials

Upload or paste comments

Add the manuscript when you want stronger redlines and grounded replies.

Waiting
Intake status

Drop your manuscript here or browse

Supports .docx and .pdf files

Upload comments, manuscript, or both.

Drop comments file or browse

Journal context

Tune the response package

The journal and citation style help Peereply match tone, formatting, and evidence handling.

1/4
Setup
Review package preview

What Peereply prepares next

Controlled draft
Response letter
Point-by-point replies
Manuscript edits
Word-ready redlines
Citation support
Formatted evidence
Example flow
Reviewer concern is classified by priority, section, and required evidence.
Response draft and manuscript edit are kept separate so you can accept, modify, or reject each part.
Included
Point-by-point replies
Clean and redline Word files
Citation candidates
Accept, edit, or reject each item

You Stay in Control

AI-assisted drafting with full editorial oversight.

Verified Citations

Automated cross-referencing with your citation library.

Tracked Changes

Native Word integration for seamless final edits.

Trusted for submissions to top-tier journals

Nature
NEJM
Physiology
Neurology
The Lancet
Cell
Science
JAMA
Nature
NEJM
Physiology
Neurology
The Lancet
Cell
Science
JAMA
100% Free — No Signup

Free Tools for Everyone

Fast tools for everyday research work.

Preflight Check

New

Grammarly-style manuscript analysis before submission

Our Mission

Your time belongs toreal research

Less admin. More research.

10x faster

Manuscript Revisions

Draft point-by-point replies grounded in your manuscript and sources.

Coming soon

Grant Rebuttals

Answer grant critiques with the same controlled workflow.

20+ hrs saved

Hours Back to Research

Move routine drafting out of your research day.

Peereply vs. generic AI

Peereply vs academic writing assistants

Writing tools help with drafts. Peereply helps with the resubmission workflow after reviewers respond.

Feature PeereplyGeneric writing tools
Manuscript Context
Deep integration with .docx files
Often centered on editor text or source libraries
Citation Support
Verified citation support for reviewer concerns
Useful citations, but not tied to reviewer rebuttal strategy
Output Quality
Point-by-point response letter and revision package
Draft text, outlines, edits, and citations
Tracked Changes
Word-ready redline planning
Usually not built around reviewer-linked redlines
Researcher Control
Accept/reject every suggestion
Writer/editor workflow
Facing a strict submission deadline?

Example output

A reviewer comment becomes a reply, redline, and export bundle.

Reviewer 2

Please add recent evidence and clarify how it changes the interpretation.

Dr. Smith (Co-Author)

Add Martinez, but keep the response short and polite.

Peereply Draft
8 seconds

We thank the reviewer for this suggestion. We added the requested comparison and clarified its effect on the interpretation.

Formal Tone Formatted citations
Proposed Redline

Our model was not previously tested validated against the benchmark dataset...

Your Package
Clean_Document.docx
Redline_Changes.docx
Point_By_Point_Review.pdf
Word_InDoc_Comments.docx
Trusted by researchers worldwide

Your next revision starts here.

Upload your reviewer comments and get a structured, citation-backed response in minutes — not days.

No subscription requiredFree credits on sign-upYour manuscript stays private

Get in Touch

Feedback, feature requests, and support questions are welcome.

support@peereply.com
Your manuscripts are encrypted and never stored permanently.